Tag: Bernard L. Madoff

  • Feds to go after Ruth Madoff’s money too

    Ruth Madoff will not get any breaks: Federal authorities plan to go after more than $100 million in real estate, cash, art, autos, boats and other property owned by her and her husband Bernard Madoff, who pleaded guilty last week to running the largest Ponzi scheme in history.

    The government said in a court filing Sunday that it intends to seize all the assets, including the Madoffs’ Upper East Side penthouse, which is in Ruth Madoff’s name, as well as their homes in Montauk, New York, Palm Beach, Florida, and France, whose combined worth has been put at $22 million.

    Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

    Click to activate this MucketyMap

    Click to activate interactive map
    (requires Java)
    MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

    Other items sought by prosecutors include $17 million in cash and $45 million in bonds held in Ruth Madoff’s name, several yachts, all bearing names ending in “Bull,” four cars, silverware valued at $69,000 and a Steinway piano worth $39,000.

    Madoff, 70, pleaded guilty March 12 to defrauding investors of as much as $65 billion and faces 150 years in prison. His attorneys filed a request with the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York that he be freed until his sentencing June 16.

    The government’s “notice of intent to seek forfeiture” is not a seizure, but rather, alerts U.S. District Judge Denny Chin and the Madoffs that prosecutors intend to go after the possessions.

    Lawyers for the Madoffs have previously argued that Ruth Madoff is the rightful owner of $69 million worth of cash and bonds, in addition to the Manhattan apartment, which they say are “unrelated” to her husband’s fraud.

    To date, she has not been accused of any wrongdoing. However, her withdrawal of $15 million from a brokerage account a short time before her husband was arrested has increased the suspicion that she knew something of her husband’s crimes.

    According to court documents filed Friday, the Madoffs had nearly a billion dollars in personal wealth at the end of last year which is now being eyed by defrauded investors trying to recoup the money they lost in Madoff’s scam.

    Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter




    Follow Muckety on Twitter


    Muckety's Facebook page


     Read related stories: Madoff · Recent Stories  

    1 Comments

    Leave a Comment


    • Henry Kravis is at the door, knocking politely

      March 18, 2009 at 9:17am

      Buyout king Henry Kravis has been humbled, if only slightly.

    • Charges against Madoff leave many unanswered questions

      Barring a change of heart, Bernard L. Madoff will plead guilty tomorrow to running a massive Ponzi scheme for at least a quarter century that defrauded thousands of people in virtually every corner of the globe.

      Based on 11 charges unveiled for the first time last night, the disgraced financier would face a maximum sentence of 150 years in jail, and required restitution and fines of as much as $170 billion. That is the amount prosecutors believe moved through his accounts during the years he conducted the fraud, although there is no indication that Madoff has anywhere close to that sum.

      Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

      Click to activate this MucketyMap

      Click to activate interactive map
      (requires Java)
      MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

      Yet the criminal information leaves the biggest questions about the scam unanswered – whether family members and colleagues were involved, where most of the money went, and what, if any, knowledge those running several large feeder funds may have had.

      Lev L. Dassin, the acting United States attorney in Manhattan, said Tuesday that his staff was still unraveling the fraud to determine who besides Madoff might have helped.

      “The filing of these charges does not end the matter,” Dassin said in a statement.

      Dassin said he has made no agreement to seek leniency in return for Madoff’s guilty plea or his cooperation in the investigation.

      The prosecutor’s release of charges offered some fresh information about how they believe Madoff conducted his scam. For starters, they up the total pricetag from his $50-billion estimate to nearly $65 billion – the amount that thousands of customers believed they had in their accounts at the time of his arrest.

      And they date the fraud to as far back as the early 1980s, when they allege that Madoff assembled an ill-trained and inexperienced clerical staff, directed them to “generate false and fraudulent documents,” told lies and supplied phony records to regulators and shuffled hundreds of millions of dollars from bank to bank to create the illusion of active trading, according to the criminal information.

      For the first time, they disclose that some investors were treated differently – a select group were offered returns as high as 45 percent, according to the criminal information

      And they raise questions about the supposed separation between Madoff’s 17th-floor investment operation and the supposedly legitimate wholesale stock trading operation that his sons ran. Prosecutors charge that from at least 2002 through 2008, more than $250 million from investors in the Ponzi scheme was transferred into the operations of those other businesses.

      They also allege that Madoff transferred money from his firm’s London office “to purchase property and services for the personal use and benefit” of himself, his family members and associates.

      Madoff has been free on $10 million bail, but confined to his apartment, since his arrest in December. It is not clear whether the government will seek to have his bail revoked if he pleads guilty on Thursday.

      The charges against him include securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, false statements, perjury, false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and theft from an employee benefit plan.

      Even if Madoff pleads guilty as expected, the judge said he will not be sentenced for several months.

      Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter




      Follow Muckety on Twitter


      Muckety's Facebook page


       Read related stories: Madoff · Recent Stories  

      0 Comments

      • There are no comments yet, be the first by filling in the form below.

      Leave a Comment


      • Harvard Law ensconced at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

        March 12, 2009 at 11:55am

        To save on travel expenses, the Harvard Law School Class of 1991 might as well have its reunion this year at the White House.

      • Madoff aide said to have ordered up fake trading tickets

        Fresh details about the alleged billion-dollar Ponzi scheme run by Bernard L. Madoff are emerging as the accused swindler prepares for a possible guilty plea in federal court Thursday.

        Annette Bongiorno, a longtime aide to Madoff, allegedly instructed two assistants to create trading tickets, now believed to be bogus, using research of daily share prices for blue-chip stocks, the Wall Street Journal reported today.

        Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

        Click to activate this MucketyMap

        Click to activate interactive map
        (requires Java)
        MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

        The “tickets” would show purported trades that Madoff made, which were in line with the annual profit reports Madoff issued to investors.

        The information comes from two assistants who were interviewed by federal authorities last month through so-called proffer agreements, in which prosecutors agree not to use their statements against them as long as they tell the truth, according to the Journal.

        Such fact-gathering doesn’t mean that prosecutors will determine there was any criminal liability. To date, no one save for Madoff has been charged with a crime. The Journal report notes that large-scale fraud investigations often begin with lower-level employees to find out what they knew about the work of their supervisor or other managers, then continue to climb up the ladder

        Bongiorno, 60, was once Madoff’s personal secretary and later oversaw some of the firm’s oldest accounts.

        The role of another Madoff employee, chief financial officer Frank DiPascali, is also being examined as part of the ongoing probe, the Journal reports.

        Bongiorno and DiPascali were longtime neighbors in the Howard Beach neighborhood of Queens, and she is said to have introduced him to Madoff, according to a Bloomberg News report.

        .

        Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter




        Follow Muckety on Twitter


        Muckety's Facebook page


         Read related stories: Madoff · Recent Stories  

        0 Comments

        • There are no comments yet, be the first by filling in the form below.

        Leave a Comment


        • Harvard Law ensconced at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

          March 12, 2009 at 11:55am

          To save on travel expenses, the Harvard Law School Class of 1991 might as well have its reunion this year at the White House.

        • Madoff to face his victims in court Thursday

          This is the week that Bernard Madoff, the former NASDAQ chairman accused of perpetrating the biggest fraud in U.S. history, will confront his victims for the first time – and perhaps even acknowledge his own culpability.

          On Thursday, at the second of two court hearings this week, the 70-year-old will come face to face with some swindled investors who until now, have had no place to air their fury and devastation.

          Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

          Click to activate this MucketyMap

          Click to activate interactive map
          (requires Java)
          MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

          If that’s not drama enough, it’s also when Madoff may plead guilty.

          Last week, the trader waived his right to have a grand jury review the charges against him, setting the stage for a possible guilty plea Criminal-defense experts say a trial is unlikely in cases where prosecutors don’t seek a grand-jury indictment.

          Should Madoff enter a guilty plea this week, it would be turned inside out for clues as to whether his wife, sons or business associates may also face prosecution. If, for instance, he tells the court that other people ‘known and unknown’ were involved in the fraud, that would increase their exposure.

          Likewise, should he be charged with, or plead guilty to conspiracy, that would suggest that prosecutors plan to go after others, former federal prosecutor Steven Frankel told Newsday.

          After his arrest Dec. 11, Madoff told authorities he acted alone in setting up a Ponzi scheme said to have involved tens of billions of dollars. But many have expressed skepticism that he could have pulled off a fraud on that scale without the notice, if not the assistance of others.

          As for Madoff’s possible prison term , that would be a function of the crimes to which he pleads.

          The charges are expected to include securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and money laundering, Newsday reported. Securities fraud alone carries a maximum sentence of 25 years.

          Federal prosecutors have also signaled they intend to go after Madoff’s assets, and filings indicate they will challenge defense attorney Ira Sorkin’s claim that Ruth Madoff should be entitled to keep $62 million in assets, in addition to their penthouse Manhattan apartment, valued at $7 million.

          It’s not clear how many investors might attend the court hearing after U.S. District Judge Denny Chin invited victims late Friday to address the court.

          Chin’s invitation was in response to papers filed by prosecutors asserting that victims had the right to be “reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.”

          Thousands lost money, among them many charitable institutions and schools. Prosecutors have asked anyone wishing to be heard to send an e-mail to usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov. by 10 a.m. Wednesday.

          “There will be some fireworks,” Brad Friedman, a New York lawyer representing dozens of people who lost hundreds of millions of dollars, told the Associated Press. “But it’s not going to be blistering because it’s a courtroom. People will stand up in a respectful but forceful manner.”

          Friedman said none of his clients have asked to attend next week’s hearing, and he’d advise them not to go.
          “I just don’t think it accomplishes a lot,” he said. “You’re not going to make him feel bad.”

          Madoff is also scheduled to appear in court Tuesday when the judge to explore whether there is a conflict of interest involving defense attorney Ira Sorkin. Sorkin’s now-deceased father had an account with Madoff, and in 1992 the lawyer represented a Florida investment firm, Avellino & Bienes, that invested with Madoff.

          Madoff is expected to tell the court he understands the potential conflicts and has decided to stick with Sorkin anyway, according to people familiar with the case.

          Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter




          Follow Muckety on Twitter


          Muckety's Facebook page


          This post is tagged with: , , , , ,
           Read related stories: Recent Stories  

          1 Comments

          • #1.   agilog 03.09.2009

            Let’s bring back the stockade for criminals like Madoff.
            Good idea or cruel and unusual?

          Leave a Comment


          • Prince Charles burnishes green credentials

            March 11, 2009 at 4:51pm

            Call him the Green Prince. Britain’s heir apparent is on a 10-day tour of Latin America to promote measures to combat climate change – and to raise his profile as a national ambassador.

          • Ruth Madoff seeks to keep NY penthouse, $62M in assets

            The wife of accused swindler Bernard Madoff is arguing that their $7 million Manhattan penthouse and an additional $62 million in assets belong to her.

            In court papers filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, Ruth Madoff and her lawyer claim that the Upper East Side apartment, $45 million in municipal bonds and $17 million more in a separate account, all belong to her, rather than to her husband, who was charged with a $50 billion scheme to defraud investors.

            Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

            Click to activate this MucketyMap

            Click to activate interactive map
            (requires Java)
            MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

            The bonds, in a Cohmad Securities account held by Ruth Madoff, and about $17 million held by her in a Wachovia Bank account, “are unrelated to the fraud, according to the papers.

            The papers were filed in connection with a U.S. District Court judge’s order Monday to partially lift a freeze on Madoff’s assets so that he could cooperate with a court-appointed trustee overseeing the liquidation of his firm to recover money for bilked investors.

            To date, the trustee has said the Manhattan penthouse apartment and other properties in Montauk, N.Y. and Palm Beach, FL, which were used to secure Bernard Madoff’s bail, were off limits. But if there’s a conviction, those assets might be seized to help pay victims’ claims.

            “We are looking at every member of the Madoff family,” David Sheen, an attorney representing the trustee said regarding the personal property.

            Cohmad Securities, where Ruth Madoff says her account holds municipal bonds, had an office in Madoff’s headquarters in midtown Manhattan. The firm was part-owned by Bernard Madoff and has been alleged by the Massachusetts Securities Division to be a “feeder fund” to his investment firm.

            Last month, Massachusetts regulators said Ruth Madoff withdrew $15.5 million from Cohmad Securities in November and December, including $10 million on the eve of her husband’s arrest for securities fraud.

            She has not been charged with any wrongdoing, however, and is represented by the same attorney as her husband.

            Bernard Madoff was arrested Dec. 11 and charged with securities fraud after authorities said that he confessed to his sons that he had carried out a Ponzi scheme for years, using new money from investors to pay off early investors, while issuing bogus statements claiming investment gains. He has been under house arrest in their Manhattan apartment.

            Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter



             Read related stories: Madoff · Recent Stories  

            1 Comments

            • #1.   Alison 03.03.2009

              She does not deserve ANY of the money or properties unless she can prove beyond a shadow of doubt that it belongs to her and did not come from her husband or one of his numerous companies, which she probably can’t. of course she is one of the rich so normal rules do not apply.
              If I had stolen lets say about $100,000.00 from my bosses and clients, would I be allowed to stay home? no my butt would be in jail so fast..
              on the TV today, it was mentioned that Barack Obama is trying to get rid of prosperity… let me tell you prosperity is not 2% of the population making more money than they can EVER spend and the rest of us watching them complain about their lot in life. I am hopeful that his efforts will be successful but even if he fails, at least he tried to do something!! remember the last guy?!? seemed to spend most of his time with his head up his butt, telling everyone that thing were going well….

            Leave a Comment


            • FCC pick Genachowski is longtime Obama friend, adviser

              March 4, 2009 at 6:04pm

              He is a law school friend of Obama’s and a successful, high-tech entrepreneur who looks to expand broadband service to rural and underserved areas, and to promote an open Internet and diverse media ownership.

            • And now there’s Marc Rich the sequel

              He may not have stepped foot on U.S. soil for more than two decades, but billionaire Marc Rich manages to stay relevant.

              Like a movie character optioned for perpetual sequel, Rich’s name has surfaced in two of the biggest news stories of 2009 – Bernard Madoff’s alleged $50-billion Ponzi scheme to defraud investors (Rich invested through middleman Ezra Merkin) and the installation of a new presidential administration (among the players, Attorney General-nominee Eric Holder, who made the ill-fated decision to forward Rich’s pardon request to then-President Bill Clinton with the recommendation “neutral, leaning towards favorable”).

              Rich’s pardon was front and center at Thursday’s confirmation hearing of Holder, as Republican Sen. Arlen Specter sought incriminating information beyond the nominee’s acknowledgement that he had “made mistakes.”

              The pardon, which was granted in the last hours of the Clinton administration, sparked a huge outcry at the time, especially after it emerged that Rich’s ex-wife, the socialite and songwriter Denise Rich, had donated an estimated $1 million to Democratic causes, including $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library fund, and had interceded on his behalf with Clinton.

              To this day, the rationale remains murky – as does the 74-year-old exile at the heart of the case.

              Rich is, in many ways, a character out of a John LeCarre novel. One of the world’s most successful and ruthless commodities traders, he has pursued opportunity where he found it, trading with despots and declared enemies when it was advantageous, from Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini to Cuba’s Fidel Castro, and then receding into the shadows when the heat got too intense.

              Born in Belgium, he emigrated with his family to the U.S. to avoid the Nazis and learned his trade in the dusty markets of the Middle East and the jungles of Africa.

              Along the way, in 1966, he met Denise Eisenberg, the daughter of a wealthy shoe manufacturer from Worcester, MA on a blind date. They married a short time later – around the time he became a trader with Philipp Brothers, a dealer in raw metals.

              One of his early business coups at Philipp Brothers came during the Arab oil embargo of 1973-1974, when he used his Middle Eastern contacts to circumvent the embargo and buy crude oil from Iran and Iraq, reportedly reselling it for twice the price to supply-starved U.S. oil companies.

              In 1974, he and colleague Pincus Green left Philipp Brothers and set up their own company, Marc Rich & Co., using the relationships they had developed with some of the world’s great scoundrels and statesmen. They became notorious for trading with Iran during the hostage crisis, South Africa during apartheid, and Cuba and Libya during U.S. trade embargoes

              Rich and Green were indicted by U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani, on charges of dodging a $48 million corporate tax bill, racketeering and trading with an enemy state, Iran in 1983. The two, who had traveled to Switzerland just before the charges were brought, were put on the FBI’s Most Wanted List.

              Though living as an exile, Rich managed to hire some of the best-connected attorneys in Washington, among them, Jack Quinn, a former Clinton White House Counsel, Leonard Garment, a former Nixon White House official; William Bradford Reynolds, a former high-ranking official in the Reagan Justice Department; and Lewis Libby, who went on to become Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff.

              And they delivered for him: On Jan. 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, Clinton granted Rich a pardon. In an op-ed column in the New York Times a month later, Clinton justified his decision, saying that similar situations had been settled in civil, not criminal court, and he also cited pleas from Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

              In response to the outcry, George W. Bush appointed federal prosecutor Mary Jo White to investigate. She stepped down before the investigation was finished, however, and was replaced by James Comey, who was critical of Clinton’s pardons – and Holder’s pardon recommendation – but could not prove a quid pro quo related to Denise Rich’s contributions.

              In the years since he fled the U.S., meanwhile, Marc Rich has lived a jetsetter’s life, traveling between homes on Lake Lucerne and in St. Moritz, Switzerland as well as in Marbella, Spain. He surrounded himself with Picassos, Chagalls and Miros and set himself the task of ingratiating himself with European leaders.

              “He went to work charming, essentially buying Swiss loyalty … he really put out the money and the charm,” Shawn Tully, a reporter who has followed his career told MSNBC at the time of his pardon.

              He became a major philanthropist throughout Europe and in Israel – his pardon application included dozens of letters attesting to his philanthropy, which reportedly runs at least into the tens of millions of dollars.

              If his life was cushy, his exile wasn’t without personal cost, however. In 1996, his 27-year-old daughter died of leukemia in the U.S. without ever seeing her father again.

              Denise Rich has always maintained that it was her daughter’s death that led her to forgive her ex-husband and to intercede on his behalf with Clinton, but has denied any quid pro quo.

              Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter


               Read related stories: Politics · Recent Stories  

              3 Comments

              • #1.   Virgil Smith 01.19.2009

                I notice the last name of the author is Eisenberg and the maiden name of Marc Rich’s wife was Eisenberg–any relation?

              • #2.   Carol Eisenberg 01.19.2009

                Nope. no relation. But you have sharp eyes!

              • #3.   C. Alexander Brown 01.21.2009

                What charities does Marc Rich support? And did support? Any in Africa, where he did a lot of business? One of my daughters was a missionary in West Africa for 11 years, and one of the things my family learned via her experience is how significantly the lives of people in Africa can be improved by even a small amount of money, judiciously spent. Also, for example, one of my former colleagues who is now with the World Bank in Washington and worked on Canadian International Development Agency –CIDA projects in arid regions of the northern reaches of Africa of Africa witnessed the lives of people in whole villages transformed by a few windmill driven water pumps, made from angle-iron struts, pipes and pumps fashioned by local blacksmiths using rudimentary tools and with rotor sails made from the door panels of junked Peugeot cars [(the favorite automobile in much of Africa, prized for its reliability and ease of repair)]. Of rich developed countries Germany and German organizations seem to have the best understanding of this basic fact about foreign aid, something not realized in other countries, and most certainly not in Canada nor the United States. So it would be interesting how Mark Rich’s generosity is appropriated, and if any poor Africans benefit therefrom.

              Leave a Comment


              The relationship map to the left is interactive.
              • Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations.
              • Expand items with + signs by double-clicking or by selecting multiple items in the map and pressing the “e” key.
              • Move an item in the map by clicking and dragging.
              • You can also delete items, separate boxes and save maps. Right-click on the map or select Map Tools for these options.
              • Find out more about an item in the map by right-clicking on the item and choosing Information about…
              • View map color key.
              • This interactive map requires Flash player.