Category: Politics

  • Waxman’s coup likely to boost Obama energy agenda

    He has been called the “scariest guy in town” and the Democrats’ Eliot Ness.

    Rep. Henry Waxman, the 69-year-old Californian who wrested control of the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee from Congress’ longest-serving chairman yesterday, is expected to usher in far more activist approach to global warming and energy independence than his predecessor, Michigan Rep. John Dingell.

    And with his longtime chief of staff Phil Schiliro just tapped by President-elect Barack Obama as his liaison with Congress, Waxman is likely to work closely with the new administration, speeding passage of Obama’s health and energy agenda, which includes spending $150 billion on renewable fuel research and one million new hybrid cars.

    “We are at a unique moment in history,” Waxman told reporters after the secret-ballot vote. “Seniority is important, but it should not be a grant of property rights to be chairman for three decades or more.”

    Waxman developed a reputation as a tough and tenacious inquisitor as chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where he churned out an endless series of reports on issues ranging from Halliburton’s excessive billing on contracts in Iraq to the ineffectiveness of abstinence-only education programs.

    Though he represents one of the most liberal and affluent districts in Congress – an area that includes Beverly Hills, West Hollywood and Santa Monica – there is nothing slick about the man.

    He grew up in an apartment over a Watts grocery store owned by his father, the son of Russian-Jewish immigrants. After a stint in the California assembly, he came to Congress as part of the group of post-Watergate reformers known as the Class of 1974.

    “Doing reports, conducting oversight – it’s what he has always done,” Schiliro told the Nation.

    Although both Dingell and Waxman support universal health care, they have fought over the best methods of curbing global warming.

    Dingell, 82, has worked on some environmental legislation, helping pass the Clean Air Act of 1990 and the raising of fuel-efficiency standards on the auto industry last year. But he has resisted previous efforts to raise fuel-efficiency standards, and environmentalists view him as an impediment.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was officially neutral in the Waxman-Dingell contest, circumvented Dingell last year by creating a temporary global warming committee chaired by Rep. Edward J. Markey of MA., a close ally.

    While Dingell’s biggest contributors have been Detroit’s automakers and telecommunications giants – hardly surprising for a Michigan lawmaker and commerce chairman – Waxman’s are health-care players and unions.

    The Center for Responsive Politics lists Dingell’s top donors as General Motors, Ford, BellSouth and DaimlerChrysler, AT&T and Comcast, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

    Waxman’s biggest contributors are the American Association for Justice, a lawyers’ trade group, the National Association of Letter Carriers, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the American Hospital Association, the Service Employees International Union and the American Medical Association, according to the watchdog group.

    The leadership change is a blow to the already-reeling auto industry, another confirmation of their diminished power on Capitol Hill. Republicans, meanwhile, expressed concern that the Democratic party is shifting leftward.

    “This decision sends a troubling signal from a Majority that has promised to govern from the center,” House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement. “They moved away from Chairman Dingell because he is committed to approaching energy and environmental issues in a manner that protects American jobs.”

    Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter


     Read related stories: News · Obama · Politics · Recent Stories  

    0 Comments

    • There are no comments yet, be the first by filling in the form below.

    Leave a Comment


    The relationship map to the left is interactive.
    • Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations.
    • Expand items with + signs by double-clicking or by selecting multiple items in the map and pressing the “e” key.
    • Move an item in the map by clicking and dragging.
    • You can also delete items, separate boxes and save maps. Right-click on the map or select Map Tools for these options.
    • Find out more about an item in the map by right-clicking on the item and choosing Information about…
    • View map color key.
    • This interactive map requires Flash player.


    • New owners take charge of Houston Astros

      November 23, 2011 at 7:38am

      After a long vetting process by Major League Baseball, ownership of the Houston Astros passed Tuesday to businessman Jim Crane and his partners.

    • Penny Pritzker says no thanks to Commerce post

      Penny Pritzker, the billionaire heiress who oversaw Barack Obama’s record-breaking fund-raising efforts, has taken herself out of the mix for U.S. Commerce Secretary.

      “Penny Pritzker ultimately has decided she does not want to do the Commerce thing,” the Chicago Tribune’s Swamp quotes a senior Obama official.

      Pritzker is already part of the Obama Biden economic transition team. But sources said it would have been exceedingly difficult for her to disentangle from her family’s far-flung business empire to fulfill the president-elect’s ethics requirements for members of his administration.

      The 49-year-old Harvard- and Stanford-educated lawyer and businesswoman, whose net worth was estimated at $2.8 billion last year, is one of a trio of Pritzkers who run a sprawling family empire that includes the Hyatt hotel chain.

      Pritzker first met the Obamas in the late 1990s when her son and daughter played in a summer basketball league at a Chicago YMCA coached by Craig Robinson, Michelle Obama’s brother, who introduced them.

      Another key link was Obama’s longtime friend Martin Nesbitt, a vice president of the Pritzker Realty group, who approached her about getting involved in Obama’s U.S. Senate campaign, where she also would serve as finance chairman then.

      A Pritzker appointment would certainly have not broken the “business as usual” mold that Obama has campaigned against. On the other hand, many commerce secretaries have been major donors of the presidents who appoint them.

      Pritzker also would have brought baggage as the former chairwoman of Chicago’s Superior Bank, which failed in 2001 after making large amounts of sub-prime loans. While she stepped down as chairwoman in 1994, she remained on the board of the bank’s holding company.

      The Chicago-Sun Times reported in April that it had obtained a letter showing that until Superior’s end, Pritzker made efforts to try to revive the bank with an expanded push into subprime loans. Pritzker’s attorney Kevin Poorman said that the kind of subprime lending that Superior was doing in 2001 was not predatory.

      Update: Chicago Sun Times columnist Lynn Sweet posts an email from Pritzker herself saying she is not a candidate for the Commerce post. “I think I can best serve our nation in my current capacity: building businesses, creating jobs and working to strengthen our economy,” Pritzker said.

      Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter


       Read related stories: Obama · Politics · Recent Stories  

      0 Comments

      • There are no comments yet, be the first by filling in the form below.

      Leave a Comment


      The relationship map to the left is interactive.
      • Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations.
      • Expand items with + signs by double-clicking or by selecting multiple items in the map and pressing the “e” key.
      • Move an item in the map by clicking and dragging.
      • You can also delete items, separate boxes and save maps. Right-click on the map or select Map Tools for these options.
      • Find out more about an item in the map by right-clicking on the item and choosing Information about…
      • View map color key.
      • This interactive map requires Flash player.


      • Sibling rivalries in national politics

        May 21, 2010 at 7:30am

        Not since 1968 have brothers stood against one another for such a powerful political position.

      • Newt Gingrich’s stock rises as GOP scrambles

        Out of the ashes of the Republican Party an old GOP warrior may be rising.

        Or at least that’s the story being pushed by boosters of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who see him as a potential savior of a battle-scarred party.

        Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

        Click to activate this MucketyMap

        Click to activate interactive map
        (requires Java)
        MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

        A chief architect of the 1994 Contract with America, the onetime Georgia congressman drove the Republican Party’s dramatic success in the 1994 elections when the GOP took control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. In 1995, Time magazine named him Person of the Year for his leadership of that short-lived revolution.

        But Gingrich resigned in 1998 in the face of GOP midterm losses and mounting ethics questions – among them, an income-tax probe and whispers that he helped lead the attack against Bill Clinton for the Monica Lewinsky affair while having an extramarital relationship himself.

        In the decade since leaving Congress, Gingrich has remained a mainstay of conservative politics, aligning himself with leading conservative think tanks and writing several books.

        And at least some in the party’s conservative wing are convinced he is the man to shepherd his party to leadership once again. They say he is an endless fount of ideas and a bulldog of a competitor. Columnist Robert Novak goes so far as to suggest him as a contender for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination:

        In serious conversations among Republicans since their election debacle Tuesday, what name is mentioned most often as the Moses, or Reagan, who could lead them out of the wilderness before 40 years?

        To the consternation of many Republicans, it is none other than Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House.

        Gingrich is far from a unanimous or even a consensus choice to run for president in 2012, but there is a strong feeling in Republican ranks that he is the only leader of their party who has shown the skill and energy to attempt a comeback quickly.

        Gingrich himself appears to be doing everything he can to encourage such talk.

        After deciding to sit out the Republican presidential primaries last year, purportedly because he wanted to devote himself to his new think tank, American Solutions, he told Los Angeles Times reporter Bob Drogin: “Make a note now. Call me the day after the 2008 election.”

        And as Republicans cast about for someone to lead them out of the post-election wilderness, he has been a relentlessly upbeat presence on the political circuit, positioning himself as party guru, if not a candidate.

        As he told Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation last Sunday: “I’ve been through the ‘64 collapse when the Republican Party was going to disappear, and the ‘74 Watergate collapse when the Republican Party was going to disappear, and the ‘92 defeat of President Bush.

        “And in each case, I watched us within a short time focus on new ideas and new solutions, and within a very short time come back as a stronger and healthier party.”

        But rehabilitating oneself as a candidate, as opposed to a talking head, may be a tough sell.

        A longtime crusader for traditional family values, Gingrich is now on his third marriage, and his infidelities have been vividly chronicled by the media, for instance in Gail Sheehy’s 1995 Vanity Fair profile.

        Also damaging were the widespread reports about how he confronted his first wife, Jackie, in a hospital room in 1980 where she was recovering from uterine cancer surgery, to hammer out the terms of a divorce.

        Even Novak acknowledges concerns about “deep ‘character flaws’ of Gingrich’s that would be difficult to overcome in a presidential campaign.”

        The problem, as Novak sees it, is that nobody else in the GOP firmament has what he calls Gingrich’s “dynamism”:

        “What is certain is that Gingrich has the desire and the will. He has a deep-seated ambition. He had not even settled into the House speaker’s chair in 1995 when he confessed to me his presidential desires for 1996. That was not to be, but he never abandoned the personal dream and is ready to pursue it now.”

        Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter



         Read related stories: Politics  

        1 Comments

        • #1.   boredwell 11.21.2008

          Apocryphal or not, the sotry goes that Clinton seated Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich in the back of Air FOrce One while flying from DC to Jerusalem to attend Yshak Rabin’s funeral. Dole and Gingrich felt snubbed. Gingrich was infuriated.

          Gingrich led the Republicans not to submit a revised budget, allowing the previously approved appropriations to expire on schedule, and causing parts of the Federal government to shut down for lack of funds. Gingrich inflicted a blow to his public image by seeming to suggest that the Republican hard-line stance over the budget was in due to his “snub” by the President.

          Gingrich’s record has shown him to be a diva and drama queen. He’s intractable and thetorically vitrolic. His vaunted, self-image polishing Contract with America turned out to be braggadocio.

          It just goes to show how backward thinking the broken GOP leadership has become in the wake of its defeat. To resurrect Gingrich illustrates that it can not(refuses?)think outside the box. Piyush (Bobby) Jindal is a better choice though the thinking behind that is warped. If pitting two people of color against one another is the GOP’s idea of “fighting fire with fire” it will fail.

          I hope they do select the former Speaker of the House as their guy. They will surely fail with that intractable man blathering at the GOP’s bully pulpit. Whatever the GOP decides it’s a guarantee that it will harken back to its static ideological belief that there is a big bad bogeyman lurking in every issue nationally and interntaionally. They are not America’s saviors. And I, for one, am sick of them.

        Leave a Comment