Judd Gregg withdraws as commerce secretary nominee

Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire withdrew his nomination as commerce secretary Thursday, citing “irresolvable conflicts” with President Barack Obama over his stimulus plan and handling of the 2010 census.

“We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy,” Gregg said in a statement released by his Senate office.

Hint: Click in map to explore connectionsStory continues below interactive map 

Click to activate this MucketyMap

Click to activate interactive map
(requires Java)
MAP HINTS: Click expands a name. Control+Click centers map on a name. Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations. For advanced tools choose Tools > Options from the menu at top. More help. Not seeing the maps? Please go here to check for the latest version of Java.

Gregg’s withdrawal set the White House back in its efforts to fill remaining Cabinet posts quickly and without drama. He was Obama’s second choice to fill the commerce post and had been the third Republican named to the cabinet. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson withdrew as commerce secretary nominee several weeks ago amid reports of a grand jury investigation into alleged wrongdoing involving state contracts.

Gregg, 61, a former New Hampshire governor, had signaled his disagreement with the president’s agenda when he abstained from the Senate vote on the stimulus package, which passed the chamber 61 to 37. He had not offered any public comment on the White House’s plan to have the Census director report to White House officials. Many Republicans, however, had voiced serious concerns about the potential politicization of the department.

A member of the Senate since 1993, Gregg is the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, and has been an outspoken critic of big spending.

In his statement, Gregg thanked Obama for the nomination, saying, “I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.”

But he suggested that he had not fully grasped the scope of his differences, saying, “Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.”

Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter



 Read related stories: Politics · Recent Stories  

0 Comments

  • There are no comments yet, be the first by filling in the form below.

Leave a Comment